(with courtesy from a Swiss Guard from the Vatican Secret Archives whom I spent a very nice time with...)
P.S.: again, one may notice that God's creations are each wearing a belly-button. Which, again, raises the question "Was God bearing self-reproductive organs? Or was he a female? In which case who did she/he get impregnated from?" …so many questions left unanswered in the « Scriptures" :-))
8 comments:
I must say, those two make quite the picture of contentment in their Garden.
It's all Babel to me.
Yes, so many unanswered questions.
The Bible as many other «religion's» scriptures, those are fables, fantasy stories from back then when SCIENCE wasn't that developed.
Even today in the 21st century, SCIENCE as archeology are always making outstanding discories about the beginning of man on Earth and all about the lost civilisations of the way past.
The discovery of places like Göbekli Tepe and more ancient human remains as the discovery by a Canadian archeologist of cave paintings that dates over 39 900 years ago, did puxzzle those scientist about our real history on Earth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caves_in_the_Maros-Pangkep_karst
The formerly Training Manager in me cannot help but smiling at the sights of your individual skills (not solely based on this post’s comments in particular):
Pat, you obviously are a VISUAL You firts picture anything that is said/explained to you for it helps you understand the other’s point of view. The excerpts from your next book which you shared with us might be a clue to that.
Upton: from my understanding you did choose a career of playing roles based upon your strong likeness about WORDS while also being very much ‘visual’, taste for staging oblige, and it reflects in each time you intervene, should it be just a comment about a blog’s article, or the descripction that would serve your narration of a memory.
Rick: maybe you are nuanced and calmer, or is it your experience speaking? Because it seems your not relying more on the visual parts - except for your fancy about fractals and buildings :-) - as much as on keywords, like those that one excerpts from a news article, leaving you with further interrogations. You may belong to the Libra sign.
(though I’m definitely not giving into such nonsense :-)
So here we have kind of a mix of both visual and word people as to their approach. We now just need someone who more likely relies on numbers. That’d be Khakibum (are you around? wanna join?) who’s appetite for numerous men is not to be demonstrated (just kiddin’ Khakibum, we’re all the same on that matter).
And yes I am just kidding. Because all of you are unique, each in your own way. Which is what makes you special. And I like that very, very much.
[End Mode: pontificating]
Last minute edit: Our friend JiEl just joined and his fact-based point of view comes to the rescue of my own point. Not only both his artistic background and career gives him an eye at things, he’s also pragmatic enough to provides us Gents with accurate facts.
(What!!! Even older than Lucy? You just ruined the Sargent Pepper’s album…)
Oh crap! What a post that single picture was :-p
You're welcome and I'm an all time fan of the Beatles having bought almost all their albums in the 60's and 70's even after they separated.
For my artistic side, as the Shreded Wheats, I also have a more «frosty» side have I did my high schools 5 years in a Science Maths curiculum because at first I was wishing to become an architect.
End up a a simpl fine art teacher....LOL!
@JiEL: the horizon works both sides. And you are most welcome with yours :-)
believed mythology: that all folk!
Post a Comment